Above: Jiahao Zheng and Arya Narang present at the spring 2026 final review in Syracuse.
The studio ran mostly online, with two exceptions. In early March, the cohort traveled to HOK’s New York office for the mid-review and an office tour. The semester closed at Syracuse on April 28 with the final review, which Oliveira and Brunner attended in person.
Separately, in mid-April, Kay Sargent, HOK’s director of thought leadership for Interiors, spent two days at Syracuse for a series of lectures and critiques. While there, she sat in with Park’s studio teams, who each gave her a brief overview of their research, and offered feedback in a guest crit.
Park paired the students into teams, each working from one of the two sites. Six projects came out of it, three on each. All three Paddington teams, unprompted, brought a health and wellness lens to their work.
The strongest ideas translated adaptability into everyday experience: movement as therapy, modular systems for urban farming and flexible retail infrastructure for entrepreneurs. One Paddington team designed a rehab clinic organized around motion. The building moved, the materials moved and movement was the therapy (below left). Another built a vertical farm whose structural cores and infrastructure could carry different kinds of urban agriculture through plug-in modules. At Tysons, one team paired pop-up stores with maker spaces, letting small entrepreneurs prototype and sell in the same place, then graduate to a permanent store if a product caught on (below right).
“The students’ research considered the sociocultural dynamics around each site and identified gaps in community-serving offerings,” Brunner said. “Their proposals envisioned futures not currently present and showed how architecture can act as a catalyst for urban, social and environmental change. In the process, they challenged conventional assumptions and expanded what’s typically possible within professional practice.”
“It was impressive how much content the students were able to create in such a short period of time,” Oliveira said. “Their final crit represented about six weeks of design work—it was a really tremendous output.”
“While the students’ heads are in the clouds, practitioners function best when our feet are on the ground,” Oliveira added. “If we can provide the students with some bumper rails, not to constrain them but to enable them to be realistic, they go into practice with aspirations that are achievable.”